TPM Online
 [Home] [Articles] [Café] [Games] [Portals] [Quotations] [Archive] [Potpourri]    [TPM Shop] [Link To Us!] [Feedback] [Contact Us ]

Mason's MeditationsInterrogations

By Ophelia Benson

An eclectic, literary challenge to everyday thinking.

Number Thirteen: Influence

We like to think we know how to think for ourselves. We like to think we're sensible, wised up, knowing, sophisticated, that we know propaganda or a sales pitch or spin or public relations cant when we see it, and can simply shut it out. We also like to think we're hip, aware, in the know, paying attention, up to speed, in touch. That we know what's going on (or is it down?) in the street, what people are saying, what everyone thinks, what's common knowledge. We do not like to be caught flat-footed, feeling stupid and out of touch and autistic and sheltered and nerdy, too busy with our pathetic dweeby indoor pasty-faced occupations to know what's going on in the world. We usually don't notice or worry too much over the fact that these two pieces of self-flattery may not be entirely compatible.

We do like to assume that we think for ourselves and make our own decisions and commitments, that we're not conformist group-thinkers. But it's not actually possible to be entirely free of influence, and we wouldn't want to be if we could. To be entirely uninfluenced, we would have to be raised in a box and fed through tubes and sensorily deprived, like some horrible Jackson's Mary kind of thought experiment, in which case we would have no mind to make up. Even if we were suckled by wolves...the wolves would influence us. No, the only alternative to taking our cues from the rest of the world is complete and utter vacuity. Being empty, blank, nothing. Without conversation and books, what thoughts could we have? Genie and Kaspar Hauser and the Wild Boy of Aveyron were not instinctive sages but tragically damaged humans.

No, we begin being shaped and changed and moulded at birth and go on that way more or less forever, though adults do have the option of escaping human influences for shorter or longer periods. The infant is ceaselessly talked to (if it's fortunate, anyway: those that aren't don't thrive), then it learns to play well with others, then it goes to school which is nothing but a giant Influence Delivery Device. Then university, work, friends and bosses and spouses and colleagues, and all through life, tv and radio, newspapers and books, phone and Internet, chat and gossip and discussion and argument. We learn to suspect and resist some influences. We listen to campaign speeches of the party we don't like and we train ourselves to disagree with them (sometimes all too well). We see an advertisement, we know it wants us to buy the car or beer or shoe and we decide Well I just won't, that's all.

But we also read books by writers and thinkers we respect and admire, they tell us things we didn't know or hadn't thought of, and they change us. That's what we read the book for, presumably. To have our existing ideas (and where did they come from?) reinforced and expanded, yes, but also to add some new ones. In short, we learn, we become educated. We start as Calibans and hope to finish as Hamlets. It's a painful process in a way, education is, it's all very obedient and compliant and conformist. We're like once-spirited horses tamely wearing the bridle, tigers doing tricks in a circus. The wild day-dreaming barefoot fell-wandering free spirit chafes and frets at a desk or in a library, as Rousseau and Wordsworth, Emerson and Thoreau, Mill and Twain knew very well. But there is much to be gained in place of what is lost, as Wordsworth remarked in 'Tintern Abbey':

That time is past,
And all its aching joys are now no more,
And all its dizzy raptures. Not for this
Faint I, nor mourn nor murmur, other gifts
Have followed; for such loss, I would believe,
Abundant recompence.

Fell wandering and day-dreaming are wonderful and essential things, but they're not everything. However confining and taming it all is to our glorious free spirits, we gain more than we lose in letting ourselves be educated and influenced. One of the things we learn is how to discriminate among influences, which to accept and which to reject. And we learn what other people have thought and said and written about these things, about education, judgment, thinking for ourselves, a decent respect for the opinions of mankind. What we lose in blissful freedom we more than make up for in mental richness and complication.

Ophelia Benson is editor of Butterflies and Wheels - http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com.

She can be emailed here.

Click here to return to the Philosophy Café

Interrogations will next be updated early June 2003

 

Previous Interrogations

1. Self and Internet
2. Perfection Isn't
3. Homo Quaerens
4. Showtime
5. Thinking Makes It So
6. Who's In There?
7. Gustave and Dawn
8. Sense and Sentimentality
9. Mind the gap
10. Weave a Net to Catch the Wind
11. Done and Not Done
12. Mere

Join Our Café mailing list

To receive *very* short messages, letting you know when the Café has been updated, just fill in your email address below - and press submit.

Email Address:
Action: Subscribe | Unsubscribe

[If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, simply fill in your subscriber email address, select "Unsubscribe", and press Submit.]

TPM Online is The Philosophers' Magazine on the net.
It is edited by Dr Jeremy Stangroom.
© The Philosophers' Magazine - 98 Mulgrave Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 6LZ
Tel/Fax +44 (0)20 8643 1504