TPM Online
 [Home] [Articles] [Café] [Games] [Portals] [Quotations] [Archive] [Potpourri]    [TPM Shop] [Link To Us!] [Feedback] [Contact Us ]

Home philosophy libraryBuilding a home philosophy library

Lyn May and Steve Deery

The sixth in a series of articles advising on how to build your own home philosophy library.

No. 6 Willard Quine, From a Logical Point of View

W. V. O. Quine, like Hume, was an empiricist, but by 1953 epistemology had moved on. The prevailing empiricist view was, thought Quine, conditioned by 'two dogmas'. The first was Kant's analytic-synthetic distinction. An analytic statement is true in virtue of the meaning of the terms used; 'a vixen is a female fox' is an analytic statement as the concept 'female fox' is contained in the concept 'vixen'. A synthetic statement is true in virtue of its relationship with matters of fact; 'foxes are carnivorous' is a synthetic statement as the concept 'carnivorous' is independent of the concept 'foxes'. The second dogma was reductionism - the view that individual statements can be reduced to their logical constructs and then confirmed or denied on the basis of immediate experience.

Quine argues that any support for the analytic-synthetic distinction is illusory: it is either circular or shifts the inherent ambiguity of 'analytic' to related terms such as meaning. Reductionism is also ill-founded as 'our statements about the external world face the tribunal of sense experience not individually but only as corporate body.' This joint attack on the 'two dogmas' means there is no privileged class of statements that we can know separate from our total set of beliefs. His holism means that 'any statement can be held true come what may', as long as it coheres with the rest of our beliefs.

So, do we know the sun will rise tomorrow? Whether we do, and what it means to know, depends on who you are prepared to believe. Take your pick, but read the books first.

 

From a Logical Point of View, W. V. O. Quine (Harvard) $15.50/£10.50

Click here to return to the Philosophy Café

A new book will be featured from June 1st 2001.

 

Join Our Café mailing list

To receive *very* short messages, letting you know when the Café has been updated, just fill in your email address below - and press submit.

Email Address:
Action: Subscribe | Unsubscribe

[If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, simply fill in your subscriber email address, select "Unsubscribe", and press Submit.]


Previous recommendations

1. Thomas Nagel's Mortal Questions
2. Douglas Hofstadter & Daniel Dennett's (eds.) The Mind's I
3. R. M. Sainsbury's Paradoxes
4. Rene Descartes's Discourse on Method and the Meditations
5. David Hume's Enquiry Concerning Humam Understanding

TPM Online is The Philosophers' Magazine on the net.
It is edited by Dr Jeremy Stangroom.
© The Philosophers' Magazine - 98 Mulgrave Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 6LZ
Tel/Fax +44 (0)20 8643 1504