Mason's Meditations

If you're looking for something to chew over, some thoughtful seeds for mental cultivation, bookmark this page for Jeff Mason's monthly meditations. To think in or take away...

Number Twenty-One: To Know or Not to Know

We are everywhere bombarded with information and knowledge claims. Information includes everything from bus time tables and tide charts to the chemical analysis of complex substances. Knowledge claims go beyond this. We find people who claim to know all sorts of things, from the nature of the True God to the way society ought to be arranged for the good of all. Simple information is not worth worrying about. We know what it is and how come by it. Information can be timely or out of date, accurate or imprecise, but, within limited contexts, we have agreed ways of telling true information from false. It is another thing altogether when knowledge claims conflict and there is no agreed means of telling what is true. We see these claims argued out in the marketplace of ideas and on the battlefields of the world.

Benign skepticism is an attitude of mind that looks at all the warring knowledge claims and refuses to be drawn into the battle. It refuses to take sides, but can see both sides. In the last three or four centuries, philosophical skepticism has been associated with a radical questioning of all knowledge. I am talking about a different kind of skepticism, one that accepts knowledge with a little "k". There are things that only a fool would doubt.

In ancient times, there were two sorts skeptics, the dogmatic and the agnostic. The dogmatic skeptics held that knowledge is impossible, and that even if it were possible, it would be incommunicable. They argue against the possibility of knowledge. Their role is entirely negative. All dogmatic skeptics can do is to rebut knowledge claims and find ways to argue against the possibility of knowledge in general. To my mind, this is too dogmatic and turns skepticism in to a kind of knowledge, a knowledge of the impossibility of knowledge. The agnostic skeptics, alternatively, do not claim to know that knowledge is impossible. They are open minded about the possibility of finding what they seek. In the original sense of the Greek, skeptics are those who seek knowledge and truth. Even if they should spend their whole lives seeking, but never finding the final answers, still, they will have escaped the morass of conflicting knowledge claims and continued to learn.

To comment on this Meditation, click here.

Click here to return to the Philosophy Café

Mason's Meditations will next be updated late-May 2002

Join Our Café mailing list

To receive *very* short messages, letting you know when the Café has been updated, just fill in your email address below - and press submit.

[If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, simply fill in your subscriber email address, select "Unsubscribe", and press Submit.]

Previous Meditations

20. Wonder (20 March 2002)
19. Dualism (20 February 2002)
18. Time and Immortality (15 January 2002)
17. Perennial Philosophy (15 November 2001)
16. Pain and Grief (15th October 2001)
15. Paradise Now (15th September 2001)
14. The Life of Pleasure (1st August 2001)
13. The Most Terrible Thing (1st July 2001)
12. Assisted Suicide (1st June 2001)
11. Death (1st May 2001)
10. Pessimism and Optimism (1st April 2001)
9. Leisure (16th March 2001)
8. The Reflective Life (1st March 2001)
7. On Having an Open Mind (15th February 2001)
6. The Art of Conversation (1st February 2001)
5. Having, Doing, Being (15th January 2001)
4. The Good of Things (1st January 2001)
3. Is Happiness Overrated? (15th December 2000)
2. The Fiction of Forevermore (1st December 2000)
1. The Art of Living (15th November 2000)